US: SAE J3067 (J2735 SE) - Secure Internet (ITS)
Description:
This solution is used within the U.S.. It combines standards associated with US: SAE J3067 (J2735 SE) with those for I-I: Secure Internet (ITS). The US: SAE J3067 (J2735 SE) standards include a proposed solution for the upper-layers to implement V2X information flows that do not yet have fully standardized messages, functionality or performance characteristics. The I-I: Secure Internet (ITS) standards include lower-layer standards that support secure communications between ITS equipment using X.509 or IEEE 1609.2 security certificates.Relevant Regions:
- United States
Comm Profile: I-I: Secure Internet (ITS)
Comm Class: WAN - Wide Area Network
Standards in Profile:
| Level | Standard |
|---|---|
| Access | Internet Subnet Alternatives |
| Mgmt | Bundle: SNMPv3 MIB |
| Security | Secure Session Alternatives |
| TransNet | Internet Transport Alternatives |
| TransNet | IP Alternatives |
Data Profile: US: SAE J3067 (J2735 SE)
Standards in Profile:
| Level | Standard |
|---|---|
| Facilities | SAE J2945/0 DSRC Common Design Elements |
| ITS Application Entity | SAE J3067 DSRC Prop Mods to 2735 |
Solution Issues Severity: 19
The severity issue score calculation only includes issues associated with standards that are included by default.
Solution Issues:
| Default | Severity | Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| True | Medium | Secure data access not provided | Security Gap | The solution does not define rules on how the application entity authenticates requests to accept or provide data. |
| True | High | Data/comm profile pairing | Standardization Gap | There are ambiguities as to how to (or if one should) couple the upper-layer standards defined in this solution with the indicated lower-layer standards. |
| True | High | Not a standard (severe) | Standardization Gap | Although the document is publicly available, it has not been the subject of a rigorous industry review and is only provided as informal guidance. It is expected that details will change significantly prior to adoption as a standard. |
| False | Medium | Option not standardized | Standardization Gap | The option set includes at least one option that is not (yet) defined in a standard. |
| False | Medium | Uncertainty about trust revocation mechanism | Security Gap | The mechanisms used to prevent bad actors from sending authorized messages is unproven. |
Solution to Triples
This solution is used on the following information flow triples: